The manual year 2020 Jesse March brought a slight-thin protrusion. A total of 730 days, the American chef coach of RB Salzburg — and thus exactly 24 hours longer than its predecessor Marco Rose. Two years both brought at the Austrian Top Club, before the call followed from the Bundesliga followed. They only started are when March was still co-coach in Leipzig and Rose Coach in Salzburg. The first comparison under chief trainers is on Saturday night.
Why one of the two took the so often already gone from Salzburg to Leipzig and the other did not, certainly the other reasons had been changed. It is certain, however, in any case: the classic RB football — frequent and high pressing, many switching marks and direct game — embodies one just more than the other.
Rose: More ball security, fewer chances — on both sides
Rose, showing the data, is more due to ball security than march. Both in Mönchengladbach and Dortmund his teams had more possession of the possession as March with Salzburg and Leipzig. For better comparability, only international games were evaluated in the past two seasons.
On the one hand, Rose meets the ball-oriented game style more frequently on an orderly opponent, causing the likelihood of goals something sinks and the value of the Expected Goals at marches is higher. On the other hand, by the ROSE approach, opposing counterparts are controlled and thus reduced bulk opportunities — is called: Rose football results on both sides of the ball less clear scoring chances than march football.
Under March it gets more direct
This also helps that Roses teams play fewer passports in the penalty area. Since the opponent has more time to format and form an orderly defensive unit, penetration into the penalty area is also difficult. March teams played more than the same period of almost three successful passports in the penalty area — mind you despite significantly less possession. This is due to the direct game and the increased own switching activities for which the Americans stands — classical RB DNA.
The values since the beginning of the 2019/20 season show the differences between Rose football and march football. Only international games were taken into account for the last two seasons. Rose
Stylish for this kind of football is above all the intensive and high pressing of the RB teams. Again, March s teams were much more active, come to a total of almost 15 pressing actions per game.
To what extent has Rose adapted?
Although Rose is close to the pressing actions in the opposing third, but interesting is the context: The lead is mainly stirring from his first season with Mönchengladbach — or maybe better: the first to Salzburg. Here, the foals had almost twice as many pressing actions in the front third (53) as in the high-speed playing time (28) and still significantly more than currently in Dortmund (35.2). March s numbers are clearly closer together and were higher than that of Rose s last and current season.
An indication that Rose could have adapted his approach after the first year in Playback — possibly also because the opponents were better set. Whether March s future looks like this?
Comments
Post a Comment